Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

absent operator → absence operator #1699

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2017
Merged

Conversation

znz
Copy link
Member

@znz znz commented Dec 18, 2017

Onigmo use absence operator instead of absent operator as the name of operator now.

Onigmo use `absence operator` instead of `absent operator` as the name of operator now.
Copy link
Member

@JuanitoFatas JuanitoFatas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@stomar
Copy link
Contributor

stomar commented Dec 20, 2017

Could you provide a reference for this statement?

PS. Please avoid non-ASCII characters in commit messages.

@JuanitoFatas
Copy link
Member

Could you provide a reference for this statement?

I think it's from: k-takata/Onigmo#87

@stomar stomar merged commit 73ef347 into ruby:master Dec 20, 2017
@stomar
Copy link
Contributor

stomar commented Dec 20, 2017

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants